Case study · Google Ads
Nearly doubled spend. Improved return.
A newly launched e-commerce account, scaled against its real constraint — with ROAS climbing to 11.84x while efficiency held.
The client
A US-based e-commerce retailer selling automotive replacement parts — windshield wipers and vehicle-specific fitment, including a higher-margin RV segment. The Google Ads account launched in early 2026, so the work started from a young account with limited performance history rather than an established one.
The challenge
Grow revenue profitably from a standing start. The real question was where growth was actually constrained: by bidding and targeting, or simply by how much budget the account could absorb? Getting that diagnosis right is the difference between over-engineering an account and unlocking the lever that actually moves it.
The approach
- Segmented structure. Shopping split into core generic and high-margin RV lines, with Search covering vehicle make/model and brand terms — so budget and bids follow margin and intent instead of being averaged across the account.
- Diagnosed the real constraint. Across review cycles the enabled campaigns were consistently limited by budget-driven impression share, not by efficiency or quality. Spend was scaled deliberately against that constraint rather than chasing structural changes the data didn’t call for.
- Disciplined weekly reviews. A fixed cadence tracking spend, ROAS, impression share, search terms, keywords and ad strength — biased toward leaving strong campaigns alone and making only the changes the data justified.
- Match-type and negative-keyword hygiene. Exact and phrase match only, with negatives maintained to cut wasted spend on irrelevant queries and stop campaigns bidding against each other.
- Feed and policy diagnostics. Caught product-level Merchant Center disapprovals that standard reporting tools didn’t surface — protecting spend and keeping the diagnosis honest instead of blaming bidding for a feed issue.
The results
Over the latest 90 days versus the prior 90, the account scaled spend by roughly 2x while improving return — the hard combination to pull off. Revenue and conversions more than doubled, and cost per purchase fell as ROAS climbed.
Why it matters
Anyone can spend more; the skill is spending more while getting more back per dollar. Here, a ~95% increase in ad spend produced a 132% increase in revenue and a 19% improvement in ROAS — growth and efficiency moving in the same direction, driven by finding the account’s true constraint and managing it with discipline.
Figures taken directly from the Google Ads account overview (USD). Comparison window: latest 90 days vs. the preceding 90 days.